According to the Archives of Pediatrics and Adolescent Medicine, in 2010 underage drinkers from ages 15-20 were responsible for 48.8% of alcohol purchases. The minimum legal drinking age(MLDA) in the United States was 18 years old until 1984, when all fifty states raised their legal drinking age to 21 or older. The drinking age should be lowered from 21 years old to 18 years old because at that age one legally becomes an adult, it would reduce the amount of unsafe drinking activity, and there are fewer drunk driving car accidents in many other countries with a drinking age of 18. In the United States at the age of eighteen you receive the rights and responsibilities of adulthood. As an adult you should be able to make your own decisions on drinking alcohol.
You can vote, smoke cigarettes, serve on juries, get married, sign contracts, be prosecuted as adults, and join the military. It is known that alcohol consumption can interfere with development of the young adult brain’s frontal lobes. The frontal lobes are essential for functions such as emotional regulation, planning, and organization. However, the decisions you can make as an adult include risking one’s life. Among these decisions should be alcohol consumption because as an adult you have the right to participate in actions that affect your health. Former Middlebury College president John McCardell wrote a New York Times op-ed that called the current drinking age “bad social policy and a terrible law.” It is a bad social policy because college is where you start making new relationships that could potentially last your entire life and to create such bonds it would be nice to just be able to talk over some beers. Allowing eighteen year olds to legally drink in regulated environments would decrease the amount of unsafe drinking activity. Bars and clubs are potentially unsafe environments, but they are supervised by employees. Prohibiting 18-20 year olds from drinking in such places causes them to choose to drink in unsupervised places such as house parties or fraternity parties. The rate of underage drinking arrests would go down if drinking were legal making crime rates decrease as well.
According to Boston University, “Allowing alcohol consumption legally might help cut down alcohol related deaths in colleges.” College students over drink and tend to have accidents because they are unsure when they will be able to have alcohol again. In 2006 according to the National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, 76.6% of twelfth graders admitted to drinking at some point in their lives. Lowering the drinking age would diminish the thrill of breaking the law. There would no longer be the exciting aspect of being rebellious. The United States increased the drinking to 21 in 1984, but its rate of traffic accidents and fatalities in the 1980s decreased less than that of European countries whose legal drinking ages are lower than 21. In the United Kingdom, only 15.88% of car accidents are related to drunk driving. In stating this, you can’t really say that having a drinking age of 18 reduces the amount of drunk driving accidents. Plus, deaths from drunk driving as a percentage of total driving fatalities have gradually decreased since 1982, two years before MLDA 21 went into effect. Since this decline came across all age groups, it cannot be because of the introduction of MLDA 21. In a 2002 meta-study of the legal drinking age and health and social problems, 72% of the studies found no statistics that related to an increase in suicide and criminal activities by adolescents if the drinking age were to be lowered to eighteen.
Raising the drinking age has been ineffective thus far. If the drinking age were to be lowered to eighteen it would have more benefits than consequences. Underage drinking enforcement is not even a priority for many law enforcement agencies. An estimated two of every 1,000 occasions of illegal drinking by youth under 21 results in an arrest. By raising the drinking age and making consumption only available for older people our laws have made drinking even more attractive. And drinking in excess has become a standard way of rebelling against what is seen as an unjust and immoral law.
Lowering the Drinking Age to 18
- :: 1 Works Cited
- Length: 2613 words (7.5 double-spaced pages)
- Rating: Excellent
There has been an ongoing controversy in the United States on whether the drinking age should be lowered to eighteen like most of the world or if it should stay at twenty-one. Underage drinking has been a major controversial issue for years, yet why is it not under control? Teenagers are continuing to buy alcohol with fake identification cards, drink, get into bars, and drink illegally. As a teen I have proof that these things are going on not only in college but in high school as well. There are a lot of factors that come together to why the drinking age should be lowered to eighteen; the most obvious reason is too many people are drinking before they are twenty-one. Liquor stores, bars, and clubs all want to make money and if they can get away with selling to underage teens then they will. A study done by the Academic Search Premier agrees that, ?By now it is obvious that the law has not succeeded in preventing the under-21 group from drinking? (Michael Smith 1).
There would be a lot of benefits to having the drinking age change to eighteen. The amount of binge drinking would lessen, and the out rage to drink would also decrease. According to Smith, ?Reports of binge drinking come from all types of campuses across the country. In 1992, researchers reported that more college?s students
were drinking to get drunk than their counterparts a decade earlier, and one recent study reported an increase, just since 1994, in the number of students who drink deliberately to get drunk? (Smith 1). I interviewed my friend Shelly Mitchell who recently turned twenty-one and asked her how she felt about finally being legal to drink. She quoted, ?It is not as exciting to drink anymore, I mean I still like to go out with my friends to bars, but the fun is all over, in high school and college it was so exciting trying to get alcohol by using a fake ID.? All of these factors could be changed by lowering the drinking age to eighteen. In a study done by the Harvard School of Public Health, binge drinking is defined as five drinks in a row for boys and four drinks for girls. And when they did a survey they found that 44% of the students attending Harvard binge drink (Jeffrey Kluger 1).
How to Cite this Page
| Lowering the Drinking Age Essay - Every year, thousands of deaths occur as a result of drunk driving, and every day people are facing the consequences of irresponsible drinking. Because of the issues caused by irresponsible drinking, the US government passed the National Minimum Drinking Age Act in 1984 which raised the minimum drinking age to twenty-one to prevent drinking-related accidents and violence. Despite the intent of its passing, it was a counterproductive decision. Because of the higher age restriction, high school upperclassmen and college underclassmen see drinking as an exciting, rebellious act.... [tags: minimum drinking age act, alcohol]|
:: 2 Works Cited
| Lowering the Drinking Age Essay - Lowering the drinking age from twenty-one to eighteen is a good idea because it will most likely promote responsibility, alcohol consumption will be more controlled, and, if not done so, it is posing as discrimination against the eighteen to twenty age group; however, lowering the legal drinking age back to eighteen can be fatal because the brains of the eighteen to twenty year old age groups are not fully developed, binge drinking and alcohol addiction rates will go up, and the drinking and driving rates will increase.... [tags: drinking, women, pregnancy]|
:: 5 Works Cited
| The Drinking Age Should Be Lowered Essay - There are numerous problems involving alcohol in the world today, including alcoholism, drunk driving, and alcohol poisoning leading to death. Many of these problems involve minors and are linked to drinking underage. The legal drinking age in many states is twenty-one years old. The purpose of this law is to keep minors out of danger: away from drunk driving, alcohol poisoning, and injuring the brain before it is fully developed. The government supports the belief that people are not ready or responsible enough for alcohol until this age.... [tags: Lowering the Drinking Age for Alcohol]|
:: 8 Works Cited
| The Impact of Lowering the Drinking Age on State University Essay - The legal drinking age in the United States will always be a point of contention. No one can settle upon a drinking age that everyone is in agreement with; should it be 18 or 21. Ages 18 and 21 are the most popular options, yet neither one has 100% of the vote. With the current legal drinking age in America standing at 21, meaning that people under the age of 21 cannot purchase or consume alcoholic food or beverages, there is the question of whether or not to lower it to 18 or 19 years old.... [tags: Pro Lower Legal Drinking Age]|
:: 13 Works Cited
| Lowering The Drinking Age To 18 Essay - Whether Or Not Should Drinking Age Be Lowered From 21 to 18 Years This discussion has been going on for long on many forums without a decisive conclusion or agreement. This is mainly because both the arguments for lowering the age to 18 years and not lowering have some substantial facts to support them. The people who are against lowering the drinking age come up with a number of arguments which are explained below. Several states like Michigan, Massachusetts, and Maine in the United States of America lowered their drinking ages to 18.... [tags: Social Issues]|
:: 5 Works Cited
|Lowering Drinking Age to 18 Essay - There has always been controversy as to whether the drinking age should be lower from 21 to a younger age, like 18. Though there are drawbacks to lowering the drinking age such as, one It may cost for use of illicit drugs. two Its easier to access other drugs, and alcohol. tree it may decrease unsafe drinking activity’s. The benefits would be that it would one get rid of feelings increasing , two people should have freedom of choice and tree, it is wrong to drink at such a young age. According to the drinking age ProCons.org, lowering the drinking age will invite more use of illicit drugs among 18-21 year olds.... [tags: alcohol, illicit drugs, teens]||1208 words|
| Essay about Lowering The Drinking Age - There always has been controversy as to should the united states lower the drinking age to 18. Eighteen year olds should have the right to drink. By lowering the drinking age to eighteen it will give people supervision, teach responsibilities, and eighteen years olds are already considered adults; however, it may cause binge drinking, it will lead to more deaths, and drinking damages brains cells and especially the body itself. Lowering the drinking age to eighteen would be good for supervision because the drinkers will drink in public where there everyone watching them.... [tags: supervision, drinkers]|
:: 5 Works Cited
| Lowering the Drinking Age Essay - Many people can make a convincing argument that the drinking age in the United States should be lowered from twenty-one to eighteen years old. The legal drinking age should not be lowered. There are many good reasons why the legal drinking age should not be lowered, such as our collective safety and our individual health. Allowing young adults to drink at a younger age will result in more fatal traffic accidents, higher crime rates, and in general cause society to degenerate. Perhaps a look at history will shed some light on the subject.... [tags: History, Consequences, Arguments]|
:: 4 Works Cited
| Lowering the Drinking Age Essay - According to Andrew Herman, “Each year, 14,000 die from drinking too much. 600,000 are victims of alcohol related physical assault and 17,000 are a result of drunken driving deaths, many being innocent bystanders” (470). These massive numbers bring about an important realization: alcohol is a huge issue in America today. Although the problem is evident in Americans of all ages, the biggest issue is present in young adults and teens. In fact, teens begin to feel the effects of alcohol twice as fast as adults and are more likely to participate in “binge-drinking” (Sullivan 473).... [tags: safety and responsibility, drunk]|
:: 9 Works Cited
|Essay Lowering The Drinking Age - Lowering The Drinking Age Everyone knows that it is illegal to consume alcohol until the age of 21. Many people are in agreement with this legal restriction. Some would even say that it should be raised. However, the legal drinking age sometimes causes more problems than it prevents. First, it is necessary to question this law. Why is 21 the "magical" age that makes one intelligent and mature enough to consume alcohol. In an alcohol summit held in Boulder Colorado, Boulder County Sheriff George Epp said "There's a general belief that immature people are less likely to handle the effects of alcohol, so our Congress has chosen to set an arbitrary limit (at age 21).... [tags: Papers]||455 words|
Drinking alcohol can be a much closed subject in some people?s lives sometimes concerning religion, and others just blatantly breaking the law. In my opinion, improving education on the effects of drinking and having open discussions on alcohol would benefit everyone. The worlds leading anthropologist agrees, ?Dr. Dwight B. Heath of Brown University, recommends: Teach Safe Drinking to your College Bound Teen? (Legal Drinking Age Website). Either parents turn a blind eye to their child drinking, punish them, or understand and do what they can to cope with their child?s drinking. Drinking has the label of being ?bad? and that makes a lot of teens want to do it more. A more sensible approach would be to have open discussions and become more educated rather than being banned. If the drinking age was eighteen, parents would be more understanding and may even offer to help with driving or be more thoughtful when their child calls drunk and can?t drive. I know from experience with friends often times they would insist on driving after they have been drinking, just because they knew they would be punished. It is known that the legal age is twenty one, yet most eighteen year olds feel as if they are already twenty-one when they can go out and buy with their fake ID or drink at a bar. ?Hanson, a sociologist who has studied drinking issues on college campuses extensively, argues that the emphasis should be less on stigmatizing alcohol and rather promoting responsible consumption of alcohol in an effort to minimize harm? (ICAP Reports Website).
In result of not being legal to consume alcohol, teenagers are being forced to be secretive and sometimes make things very dangerous. Parties are not being thrown in houses, but in deserted fields outside of town. I know from experience a fellow class mate of mine threw his graduation party in the mountains where the road to get up to the spot was curvy and steep. The rule was everyone who went had to camp out, but some people always get away with leaving drunk. Smith exclaims, ?The drinking age of twenty-one has driven student partying to less public, and thus more dangerous, venues. To avoid being caught drinking illegally, students frequently party off campus. With less oversight from adults, heavy drinking, brawling, and sexual misconduct are more likely to occur? (Smith 2). The environment in which one drinks in is very important, and being under twenty-one we are forced to do it in secretive places, most people hiding from the police, and or other members of authority. Wisconsin?s Attorney General Jim Doyle speaks from experience with his two sons, ?I would rather have them drinking in a setting where somebody?s checked an ID at an establishment, instead of an unsupervised situation where two hundred kids will crowd into a basement of a house, turn off the lights and drink themselves sick? (Rally Website). This is what is happening all the time, in society today. Kids will find a way to get away with it, but getting caught is not something they want to happen. The first thing that comes to a teenagers mind when their parents go out of town is, ?party at my house.? This is very sad, yet true. In high school people would go around with cups and collect money for the party keg that weekend. Authority officials would see this and the child would just be told to put it away.
The drinking age is arbitrary, why twenty-one and not nineteen or twenty or even twenty-five, why does twenty-one make you more responsible? Michael Smith?s article is titled, ?Treat Students as Adults: Set the Drinking Age at Eighteen, not Twenty-one.? Smith quotes, ?For most other purposes today, we treat eighteen-year-olds as adults. They can vote for the President, fire a rifle for the military, buy and sell real estate, and raise families of their own. It is blatantly inconsistent to forbid them to drink. Many of them view the setting of the drinking age at twenty-one as hypocritical.? According to Smith, ?Small wonder it hasn?t worked? (Smith 2). I happen to agree with Smith and everything he says in that quote, it makes no sense at all to be treated as an adult in some instances and others not. Teenagers are being forced to get alcohol using illegal identification or making someone twenty-one-years or older to get it for them. On a website for the U.S. congress, Rainforth who is running for the U.S. Congress agrees that, ?A person becomes an adult at the age of eighteen according to the government. I believe that all rights of adults should be extended to persons reaching this age. This includes the ability to choose whether or not one wishes to buy and consume alcoholic beverages. Not extending the right is hypocrisy? (Rainforth for U.S. Congress Website). The government trusts us to vote for who rules our county and fight for our country, why can they not treat us like full adults for another three years (Petition Website).
In Europe there is a whole different feel about drinking. As a British citizen I have been brought up with completely different ideas about drinking. It has always been a social aspect of my life until we moved to the states in 1993. Even though I was only eight when I moved here, we go back twice year and I can?t believe how different it is. In England it is legal to go to the pub (bar) with your parents at the age of fifteen and order a drink and eighteen when you are alone. The United Sates is one out of five countries where the drinking age is twenty-one. Egypt, Honduras, Russia, and Samoa all have the drinking age set at twenty-one. Nineteen countries have a minimum drinking age of eighteen and two have a minimum of sixteen, and one which is Japan has the age set at twenty (ICAP Reports Website). This encourages responsible drinking as done with parents in a civilized environment. Fewer stigmas in England are associated with drinking as teenagers are allowed by parents to drink responsibly at home. Interviewing my father, Ian Brownlow, who spent his teenage years in England, looks at drinking more as a social aspect of life, not as a large harmful issue as the United States does. When asking him what he thought about lowering the drinking age he answered, ?Yes, in conjunction with promoting greater education about drinking and higher penalties for DWI offences.? I also asked him how his teenage years differed from ours, because he was legal to drink. He exclaimed, ?The whole reaction to teen drinking was ?normal? and measured. There was no binge drinking and for the most part drinking was done in a responsible manner. It was ?cooler? to smoke because this was not allowed. In America today, the negative reaction to drinking by teens promotes binge drinking or drinking under peer pressure to be cool. If drinking were allowed it would be much easier for a teen to say no.?
When teenagers are motivated to get something they want, most times they will get it. Walking around the cafeteria I eat dinner at each evening I decided to take a poll on my fellow classmates who are also eighteens years of age. I went around to thirty different students asking them how many times a week they drank and how they got their hands on the liquor. Out of the thirty randomly picked students not one student said they didn?t drink and more than half admitted they drink three times a week or more. Also only four out of the thirty said they get their liquor through someone who is truly twenty-one, the other twenty-six either have a fake identification card or one of their friends have one. These results were ones I expected to get. This proves the point that liquor stores are most definitely selling to underage teens. The teens that I talked to are not just having one or two drinks when they go out, they are drinking excessive amounts three times a week or more. In a survey done though the media by Anne Wagner in June of 2001, out of nine hundred nineteen year olds, eighty percent admitted to underage drinking. Another survey was taken over every age category seeing how many people started drinking before they were actually legal. Between ages eighteen to thirty-four there were eighty percent, ages thirty-five to fifty there were sixty-nine percent, ages fifty-one to fifty-nine there were sixty-five percent, ages sixty to sixty-nine there were forty-nine percent, and seventy and older there were thirty-seven percent. That concludes that people have been underage drinking since the 1930?s.
The President at Middlebury College in Vermont expresses, ?The twenty-one year drinking age has not reduced drinking on campuses, it has probably increased it.? John McCardell also explains, ?Society expects us to graduate students who have been educated to drink responsibly. But, society has severely circumscribed our ability to do that? (Petition Website). For some states the drinking age was eighteen, but by 1987, all states had complied to the twenty-one minimum age law (ICAP Reports Website). Despite the fact that many in society would agree that the legal drinking age should be lowered, it is difficult to make it happen because politically no one would be interested in supporting it for fear of losing votes. Should it be a state by state issue or a Federal issue? ?Legislation for the minimum drinking age in the United States varied from state to state just over a decade ago, ranging from eighteen to twenty-one? (ICAP Reports Website). Now it is primarily initiated federally. Around the world noting that both consumption and purchasing laws in most countries are set at eighteen, looking at reports in the United States there is no major legislative movement going in either direction (ICAP Reports Website).
United States Senator George Allen quotes, ?If college [age] kids could just get their act together politically the [drinking age] law would change? (Rally Website). This is possibly true, it might take a few years, but this issue has not come up for a very long time, and when was the last time it was initiated by the college student age bracket. Wisconsin Attorney, General Jim Doyle, also favors lowering the legal drinking age to nineteen if the age was adopted nationally. He argues, ?I wish the federal government, when they are thinking about 0.08, would think about a uniform drinking age of nineteen,? he also continues to say, ?I think this idea that somehow we?re going to keep kids between nineteen and twenty-one from drinking is a myth. We should recognize it?s a myth. We ought to put it up front, and be morally responsible about it? (Rally Website). There are so many people in denial about this issue, it is happening all over every state and most people are turning a blind eye to it, sometimes even people in the police force. I have had a few different experiences with police breaking up a party and most times I was very astonished by the outcome. At one party a cop yelled at some friends and I, ?Go on, just head to the next party, this one is over.? My friends and I were so baffled by this. We are always very responsible and have a designated driver, but the other people that were there were just told to leave that location it. The police officers were not even checking to see if they were capable of driving safely. This happened a lot through out high school and on rare instances you would hear about someone getting a DUI, which is driving under the influence, but those were very rare. It was almost as if police officers did not want to deal with it.
The counter argument to this topic is that the drinking age is better off at twenty-one and should stay at this age. In a study done by Traci Toomey, she explains, ?A higher legal drinking age was correlated with a lower number of alcohol problems among youth? (Toomey 3). Not only does Toomey believe this, but she also goes on to say that, ??the minimum legal drinking age of twenty-one saves the lives of well over 1,000 youth each year? (Toomey 3). These are all things that come to mind when I am supporting the opposite of this, but it is hard to believe that it is true when there is so much underage drinking going on everywhere, and it does not seem to be able to be stopped.
In conclusion, I have found a lot of information to support my side to this controversial issue. I strongly believe that the minimum legal drinking age should be set at eighteen not twenty-one. Underage drinking is going on in every state and is obviously not being controlled. If a person can vote, and even go to war at eighteen, why shouldn?t they be able to go out to dinner and have a class of wine? This issue is primarily initiated federally, but if a few states don?t come together soon and start addressing this huge problem of underage drinking, this problem will continue go on and most like worsen.